<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="pyblosxom/1.4.1 7/27/2007" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<title>Блогчетање 29 Feb 2008</title>
<link>https://danilo.segan.org/blog</link>
<description>Данилово блогче</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
  <title>Ever heard of an &quot;Awesome Bar&quot;?</title>
  <link>https://danilo.segan.org/blog/gnome/epiphany-rocks-my-world</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>I've just noticed the name of <a
href="http://www.marcozehe.de/2008/02/29/what-on-earth-are-places/">awesome
bar</a> being used for a new functionality in Firefox 3.</p>

<p>All the features described there I have been using for years. In
that simple-yet-powerful browser called <a
href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/epiphany/">Epiphany</a>: instead
of an awesome bar, you get used to an <em>awesome browser</em>.</p>

<p>I know I've been taking it for granted for years,
and only other-browser praising articles like the one above make me
say:</p>

<center><strong>Epiphany rocks! Thanks guys!</strong></center>

<p>It's a shame not many distributions are shipping Epiphany as
default (to the point that I am even jealous of KUbuntu guys, who get
to ship Konqueror as the default web browser, compared to GNOME-based
Ubuntu shipping Firefox).</p>

<p><em>For those wanting to comment how web sites are not designed for
Epiphany (I've heard comments like that before), Epiphany uses the
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecko_(layout_engine)">Gecko
engine</a>, the very same thing used in Firefox.</p>

]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
